Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jack Cluth's avatar

"The minute we feel superior—about anything—we’re already in over our heads." Wherefore are thou, Elon Musk??

You state that the past must never be prologue, but past is all too often just that. If we learned from history, we wouldn't have this problem, but, alas, humanity has never been good at that. We react, but seldom from experience- more often from anger and hatred.

Sadly, compassion and fascism go together like Donald Trump and integrity. They occupy different and mutually incompatible universes, like opposite poles of a magnet. I doubt that will change anytime soon, not as long as hatred can be weaponized.

Expand full comment
Gary Herstein's avatar

Lest anyone think the use of the term "fascism" is out of place with people like Meloni or Trump, it helps to refer to what experts like Robert O. Paxton tell us about fascism.

Fascism is:

"... a form of political behavior marked by obsessive preoccupation with community decline, humiliation or victimhood and by compensatory cults of unity, energy and purity, in which a mass-based party of committed nationalist militants, working in uneasy but effective collaboration with traditional elites, abandons democratic liberties and pursues with redemptive violence and without ethical or legal restraints goals of internal cleansing and external expansion."

-- Robert O. Paxton, 'Anatomy of Fascism' [4267] Kindle edition.

(The "cult of victimhood" (my phrase) was on full display with Florida Man's recent announcement.)

In addition, there are these supplementary points on Fascism, and what Paxton calls its “mobilizing passions:”

-- A sense of overwhelming crisis beyond the reach of any traditional solutions.

-- The primacy of the group, toward which one has duties superior to every right, whether individual or universal, and the subordination of the individual to it.

-- The belief that one's group is a victim, a sentiment that justifies any action, without legal or moral limits, against its enemies, both internal and external.

-- Dread of the group's decline under the effects of individualistic liberalism, class conflict, and alien influences.

-- The need for closer integration of a purer community, by consent if possible, or by exclusionary violence if necessary.

-- The need for natural chiefs (always male), culminating in a national chieftain who alone is capable of incarnating the group's historical destiny.

-- The superiority of the leader's instincts over abstract and universal reason.

-- The beauty of violence and the efficacy of will, when they are devoted to the group's success.

-- The right of the chosen people to dominate others without restraint from any kind of human or divine law, right being decided by the sole criterion of the group's prowess within a Darwinian struggle.

(I keep these texts on hand for easy sharing.)

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts