Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Vian's avatar

I read to the end of your article with anticipation, wanting your "five ways" to drive inspire me to action, to go to the ramparts. But, I was, I must say, a little disappointed because the advice would fail, methinks, to penetrate the mind of those who grew up in the digital ecosystem. Those of us who had a life before smartphones get it, but, we are a dying breed, and we're probably doing most of what you advise anyway.

What we need here is an "anti-Vietnam" movement. There was a war; there was a rationale to getting the hell out; there was a generational divide; there was a moral dimension to the movement; there were leaders and heroes on the protest side, and real villains in opposition, there was a supporting cast amongst musicians and artists. And so on.

So, where's our Vietnam when we need one? Well, it ain't found in geography. I think it's hyper-capitalism. There is an interlocking symbiosis of giant corporations who, with massive computer power, diabolical algorithms and quarterly profit objectives have seized control of our minds with a kind of hypnotic incrementalism that has us in the grip of their matrix.

The Vietnam protest movement did not start as a mass movement. It started when a few started to articulate the outrageous "anti-communist" nonsense that evolved since the end of WW2 and shaped the politics of the 20th century and resulted in the Cold War and then arrogant barbarities that America imposed on Vietnam and elsewhere. It was during the 20th century that American style capitalism became the prime mover of the American empire. Eisenhower had anticipated it by his identification of the military-industrial complex, but the corporate complex was much more complex than that.

Going to museums, reading books in print form, dressing differently etc cannot overcome the power of hyper-capitalism. An honest to god revolt might do it, if it catches fire.

Expand full comment
Gary Herstein's avatar

Plato in the Phaedrus(? not actually too sure. I realize it is a crime against god and reality to say this, but I despise Plato and spend no more time on him than I must. I'm with Thackeray and his evaluation of Socrates: The more I read about him, the less I wonder that they poisoned him) expresses his despite for paper books, because they weaken the memory. This feeds my educated distrust of those who would condemn eBooks as inferior. The fact is, they are too recent an invention to really know what the long term differences might be (if any.) (A professor of my acquaintance said he preferred dead-trees because he remembered his annotations by "seeing" where they were in the book. Trouble is, he was no better at finding his notes than I was at finding *his* notes. On my kindle, I simply scrolled through the list or did a text search.)

There's a group I'm a part of that meets about once every month (virtually) called "Socrates Salon." The central theme is conversation, bring folks together over a topic and allow everyone to have their say, and then respond. Living where I do (the asshole of Southern Illinois, where dreams go to die) over any given month, this is often the only real conversation I ever have. (I don't count talking to the checkout clerk at the grocery. "Your total comes to ... " is not a conversation.) I've studied the problem long enough to know that there simply is no solution. I can't afford to move, I can't afford to get out more; and the people down here are almost universally Christian Dominionist neo-Fascists who believe God the father, the son, and the holy spirit, are Trump, Don Jr., and Ivanka.

I almost didn't look up "Thirst Trap." I felt a little like Sean Bean in The Martian: "I typed it into Google. Don't."

Finally: I have a flip-phone. I will never have a Smart Phone. Internet access is through a dedicated device. Reading is through a dedicated device. Using the phone is through a dedicated device.

All you kids get off my lawn.

Expand full comment
12 more comments...

No posts